Who do you prefer? |
Republicans |
|
47% |
[ 11 ] |
Democrats |
|
26% |
[ 6 ] |
Neither, fuck em'. |
|
26% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 23 |
|
|
Author
|
Thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brules
M F C E O
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 11074
Location: Konnichiwa, bitches.
|
|
|
This thread will self destruct in 10....9.....8......7.....
For you Wes *Clinton* Clark fans out there:
Newsweek, September 29, 2003 Issue
After Al Qaeda attacked America, retired Gen. Wes Clark thought the Bush administration would invite him to join its team. After all, he'd been NATO commander, he knew how to build military coalitions and the investment firm he now worked for had strong Bush ties. But when GOP friends inquired, they were told: forget it. WORD WAS THAT Karl Rove, the president's political mastermind, had blocked the idea. Clark was furious. Last January, at a conference in Switzerland, he happened to chat with two prominent Republicans, Colorado Gov. Bill Owens and Marc Holtzman, now president of the University of Denver. "I would have been a Republican," Clark told them, "if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls." Soon thereafter, in fact, Clark quit his day job and began seriously planning to enter the presidential race -- as a Democrat. Clark late last week insisted the remark was a "humorous tweak." The two others said it was anything but. "He went into detail about his grievances," Holtzman said. "Clark wasn't joking. We were really shocked."
Yeah....he's the man!
The guy is a total fucktard. Anyone remember this snappy little pic?
by Robert Novak, Townhall.com, September 22, 2003
The important Democrats eager to run retired Gen. Wesley Clark for president might exercise due diligence about a military career that was nearly terminated before he got his fourth star and then came to a premature end. The trouble with the general is pointed out by a bizarre incident in Bosnia nearly a decade ago. Clark was a three-star (lieutenant general) who directed strategic plans and policy for the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Washington. On Aug. 26, 1994, in the northern Bosnian city of Banja Luka, he met and exchanged gifts with the notorious Bosnian Serb commander and indicted war criminal, Gen. Ratko Mladic. The meeting took place against the State Department's wishes and may have contributed to Clark's failure to be promoted until political pressure intervened. The shocking photo of Mladic and Clark wearing each other's military caps was distributed throughout Europe. . .
I would direct you all to this site for much more on Mr. Clark:
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles8/DVNS_Wesley-Clark.htm _________________ K-SWISS Power cologne. Who knew you could bottle the scent of boner?
|
Tue Jan 06, 2004 10:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
HaVoK
spamlinkcount++
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 2198
Location: in a room
|
|
|
for that pic w/ slobidan milosivic, it is not unusual for people to take pictures of diplomats smiling when they meet for discussion.. he was supreme comander of alied forces in europe and his job was to talk to him about all things. Remeber the good o'l picks of churchill, stalin, and truman sitting together enjoying a good laugh even though stalin knew these were his sworn enemies after germany fell... and anyone who didnt support us invading iraq on what our wonderful president claimed was their, they they are lieing their ass off, or are a complete human rights activist, which no polition falls under.... It is more about the way bush ran his government and set his policy during the war. the amount of bumbling he did in office was inexcusible. leaking high ranking cia agents names while they are in cover? Makeing false claims of WMD becuase he basicly just has that feeling? Claiming that he was going into Iraq because of past human right violations like gasing his own people? Please, we completely supported him at that time, and didnt lift a finger to even point at him for doing somethign wrong... the fact that the people he gaassed supported his enemy in the war and was a real threat for an in country rebeliion made his move justified in the world theater when it happened, but of course our wonderful propaganda machine kicks in when it suits our intrest to turn that incidend into something worse than what o'l milosivec was doing.. and thats just not true. infact, his basic announcment to the world was he had decided to perform an operation to supress a possible terrorist movement in his own country in faver of the islamic government of iran. I like clark because I feel he has different values and has more things in his intrest than most politicians. Obviously anyone who knows what is going on with the oil contracts right now knows that chaney had more than a small hand in urging this war... his o'l buddies back at haliburton were the number one benifactors of it... and if you think thats coincidence, then I have a ton of land to sell you... I feel that since clark is coming out of the military, and not out of a civillian coorporation, I can see him leaning more towrads they type people he comanded and served with, not the club of billionaires he was in. I can also see him doing whats right for the military, which is keeping a good defense budget and investing in new technology, knstaed of taking them to war on a hunch. I wish McCain would run as an independent. I think he is by far the best man for the job, and I would back him before anyone... but I honestly prefer clark. you cannont point at a gov. official and say he has a perfect record.. no one does... and most have been involved in extremely illigal offairs... but since they were white collar they were never really investigated, so they get off without even a warning... (execs at enron, williams, mci and many others... they will eventually wind up running for office...) _________________ "You can drink a shy girl crazy, you can drink 'till that good girl sins.. you can even drink an ugly girl pretty, but you cant drink a fat girl thin" -Jeff Daniels
“Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made,” Otto von Bismarck
|
Tue Jan 06, 2004 11:50 am
|
|
|
|