Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 445
Location: Tulsa, OK
which do you think works better for games?
im leaning towards the 128mb radeon _________________ 63.209.36.10:27015
CS 1.6
Last edited by TheDeadAvenger on Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:17 pm; edited 2 times in total
Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:09 pm
nimda
Curator of art Faggory
Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Posts: 12180
Location: on a mountain in colorado
um, did you mean the gfx 5900? cuz i'm pretty sure the 9800pro spanks the gfx 5200 _________________ site5 hosting • facebook • flickr
Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:11 pm
TheDeadAvenger
1337
Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 445
Location: Tulsa, OK
whoops yeah...im an idiot. can i fix that? _________________ 63.209.36.10:27015
CS 1.6
Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:15 pm
TheDeadAvenger
1337
Joined: 08 Sep 2003
Posts: 445
Location: Tulsa, OK
oops....
screw it
i cant fix it _________________ 63.209.36.10:27015
CS 1.6
Fri Sep 19, 2003 5:17 pm
Brules
M F C E O
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 11074
Location: Konnichiwa, bitches.
Dude definately the GFX 5900.....!!!!!! _________________ K-SWISS Power cologne. Who knew you could bottle the scent of boner?
Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:46 pm
GeneticWeapon
Cum back to EVE!
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 234
There's no such thing as a GeForce4 FX5200
Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:53 pm
GeneticWeapon
Cum back to EVE!
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 234
Brules wrote: Dude definately the GFX 5900.....!!!!!!
Lol....deffinately not the FX5900. In all of the new DX9 tests that have come out, the 5900 has been sucking ass, and getting spanked by an ATi 9600Pro. Pathetic.
Here.. http://www.beyond3d.com/misc/hl2/index.php?p=3
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum